Skip to main content

Bundalong vs Winnindoo

Property investment comparison - Bundalong, VIC 3730 vs Winnindoo, VIC 3858

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundalong wins 1, Winnindoo wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBundalongWinnindoo
Median house price$830K$830K
Median unit price$525K$265K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.45%2.72%
Gross rental yield (units)3.77%4.29%
1-year house growth+6.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%0.5%
Population512127

Bundalong vs Winnindoo: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Bundalong and $830K in Winnindoo.

For units, Bundalong sits at a median of $525K against $265K in Winnindoo, which makes Winnindoo the more affordable unit market and Bundalong the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bundalong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.45%, compared with 2.72% in Winnindoo, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Winnindoo and 1.1% in Bundalong, so landlords in Winnindoo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bundalong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 512 against 127, roughly 4.0 times the size of Winnindoo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bundalong for rental income, Winnindoo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison