Skip to main content

Bundoora vs Creswick North

Property investment comparison - Bundoora, VIC 3083 vs Creswick North, VIC 3363

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundoora wins 1, Creswick North wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBundooraCreswick North
Median house price$910K$905K
Median unit price$505K$255K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.44%2.77%
Gross rental yield (units)5.25%7.41%
1-year house growth+1.8%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.7%
Population28,06855

Bundoora vs Creswick North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $910K in Bundoora and $905K in Creswick North, so Creswick North is the cheaper entry point, with Bundoora houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bundoora sits at a median of $505K against $255K in Creswick North, which makes Creswick North the more affordable unit market and Bundoora the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bundoora leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 2.77% in Creswick North, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Creswick North and 1.5% in Bundoora, so landlords in Creswick North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bundoora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,068 against 55, roughly 510 times the size of Creswick North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bundoora for rental income, Creswick North for a lower purchase price, Creswick North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison