Skip to main content

Bundoora vs Lake Goldsmith

Property investment comparison - Bundoora, VIC 3083 vs Lake Goldsmith, VIC 3373

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundoora wins 1, Lake Goldsmith wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBundooraLake Goldsmith
Median house price$910K$910K
Median unit price$505K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.44%2.08%
Gross rental yield (units)5.25%-
1-year house growth+1.8%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.8%
Population28,06822

Bundoora vs Lake Goldsmith: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $910K in Bundoora and $910K in Lake Goldsmith.

On cash flow, Bundoora leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 2.08% in Lake Goldsmith, a gap of 1.36 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Lake Goldsmith and 1.5% in Bundoora, so landlords in Lake Goldsmith face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bundoora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,068 against 22, roughly 1276 times the size of Lake Goldsmith; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bundoora for rental income, Lake Goldsmith for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison