Skip to main content

Bundoora vs Langwarrin

Property investment comparison - Bundoora, VIC 3083 vs Langwarrin, VIC 3910

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundoora wins 3, Langwarrin wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBundooraLangwarrin
Median house price$910K$915K
Median unit price$505K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.44%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.25%4.46%
1-year house growth+1.8%estimate+5.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%1.4%
Population28,06823,588

Bundoora vs Langwarrin: what the numbers say

The median house price is $910K in Bundoora and $915K in Langwarrin, so Bundoora is the cheaper entry point, with Langwarrin houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bundoora sits at a median of $505K against $665K in Langwarrin, which makes Bundoora the more affordable unit market and Langwarrin the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.8% in Bundoora (an estimate) and +5.6% in Langwarrin (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Langwarrin, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Langwarrin and 1.5% in Bundoora, so landlords in Langwarrin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bundoora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,068 against 23,588, larger than Langwarrin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bundoora for a lower purchase price, Langwarrin for recent price momentum, Langwarrin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison