Bundoora vs Loch
Property investment comparison - Bundoora, VIC 3083 vs Loch, VIC 3945
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundoora wins 2, Loch wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bundoora | Loch |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $910K | $905K |
| Median unit price | $505K | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.44% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.25% | 2.74% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 8.7% |
| Population | 28,068 | 707 |
Bundoora vs Loch: what the numbers say
The median house price is $910K in Bundoora and $905K in Loch, so Loch is the cheaper entry point, with Bundoora houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Bundoora sits at a median of $505K against $395K in Loch, which makes Loch the more affordable unit market and Bundoora the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Bundoora and 8.7% in Loch, so landlords in Bundoora face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bundoora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,068 against 707, roughly 40 times the size of Loch; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Loch for a lower purchase price, Bundoora for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison