Bundoora vs Werona
Property investment comparison - Bundoora, VIC 3083 vs Werona, VIC 3364
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundoora wins 2, Werona wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bundoora | Werona |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $910K | $910K |
| Median unit price | $505K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.44% | 3.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.25% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Population | 28,068 | 43 |
Bundoora vs Werona: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $910K in Bundoora and $910K in Werona.
On cash flow, Bundoora leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 3.35% in Werona, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Bundoora and 1.6% in Werona, so landlords in Bundoora face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bundoora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,068 against 43, roughly 653 times the size of Werona; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bundoora for rental income, Bundoora for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison