Bungador vs Lakes Entrance
Property investment comparison - Bungador, VIC 3260 vs Lakes Entrance, VIC 3909
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bungador wins 2, Lakes Entrance wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bungador | Lakes Entrance |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $530K | $540K |
| Median unit price | - | $430K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.50% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +4.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +0.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Population | 65 | 5,145 |
Bungador vs Lakes Entrance: what the numbers say
The median house price is $530K in Bungador and $540K in Lakes Entrance, so Bungador is the cheaper entry point, with Lakes Entrance houses about 2% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bungador and 1.4% in Lakes Entrance, so landlords in Bungador face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lakes Entrance is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,145 against 65, roughly 79 times the size of Bungador; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bungador for a lower purchase price, Bungador for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Lakes Entrance, VIC 3909
Open Lakes Entrance suburb profileRecent sales in Lakes Entrance
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison