Bungalally vs Hallam
Property investment comparison - Bungalally, VIC 3401 vs Hallam, VIC 3803
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bungalally wins 0, Hallam wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bungalally | Hallam |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $805K | $805K |
| Median unit price | - | $625K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.61% | 3.68% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.40% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.0% |
| Population | 93 | 11,355 |
Bungalally vs Hallam: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $805K in Bungalally and $805K in Hallam.
On cash flow, Hallam leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.68%, compared with 2.61% in Bungalally, a gap of 1.07 percentage points.
Hallam is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,355 against 93, roughly 122 times the size of Bungalally; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hallam for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison