Bungalally vs Waurn Ponds
Property investment comparison - Bungalally, VIC 3401 vs Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bungalally wins 1, Waurn Ponds wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bungalally | Waurn Ponds |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $805K | $810K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.61% | 3.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -4.4% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 3.7% |
| Population | 93 | 4,956 |
Bungalally vs Waurn Ponds: what the numbers say
The median house price is $805K in Bungalally and $810K in Waurn Ponds, so Bungalally is the cheaper entry point, with Waurn Ponds houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Waurn Ponds leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 2.61% in Bungalally, a gap of 1.19 percentage points.
Waurn Ponds is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,956 against 93, roughly 53 times the size of Bungalally; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Waurn Ponds for rental income, Bungalally for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison