Skip to main content

Bungalow vs Pittsworth

Property investment comparison - Bungalow, QLD 4870 vs Pittsworth, QLD 4356

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bungalow wins 2, Pittsworth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBungalowPittsworth
Median house price$690K$690K
Median unit price$375K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.86%
Gross rental yield (units)6.38%3.18%
1-year house growth+16.6%+19.0%
3-year house growth+43.9%+75.6%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.4%
Population2,3583,300

Bungalow vs Pittsworth: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $690K in Bungalow and $690K in Pittsworth.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.6% in Bungalow and +19.0% in Pittsworth, so recent momentum favours Pittsworth, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bungalow houses are +43.9% and Pittsworth houses +75.6%, so Pittsworth has compounded faster than Bungalow over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Bungalow and 1.4% in Pittsworth, so landlords in Bungalow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Pittsworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,300 against 2,358, larger than Bungalow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pittsworth for recent price momentum, Bungalow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison