Skip to main content

Buninyong vs Mernda

Property investment comparison - Buninyong, VIC 3357 vs Mernda, VIC 3754

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buninyong wins 3, Mernda wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuninyongMernda
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price$455K$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.35%3.81%
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%4.95%
1-year house growth+10.3%+4.9%estimate
3-year house growth+7.7%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.0%
Population3,79723,369

Buninyong vs Mernda: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Buninyong and $750K in Mernda.

For units, Buninyong sits at a median of $455K against $500K in Mernda, which makes Buninyong the more affordable unit market and Mernda the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mernda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.81%, compared with 3.35% in Buninyong, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.3% in Buninyong and +4.9% in Mernda (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Buninyong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Buninyong and 2.0% in Mernda, so landlords in Buninyong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mernda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,369 against 3,797, roughly 6 times the size of Buninyong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mernda for rental income, Buninyong for recent price momentum, Buninyong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison