Skip to main content

Buninyong vs St Germains

Property investment comparison - Buninyong, VIC 3357 vs St Germains, VIC 3620

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buninyong wins 1, St Germains wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuninyongSt Germains
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price$455K$350K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.35%3.56%
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%4.60%
1-year house growth+10.3%-
3-year house growth+7.7%-
Vacancy rate1.4%0.4%
Population3,79775

Buninyong vs St Germains: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Buninyong and $750K in St Germains.

For units, Buninyong sits at a median of $455K against $350K in St Germains, which makes St Germains the more affordable unit market and Buninyong the pricier one.

On cash flow, St Germains leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.56%, compared with 3.35% in Buninyong, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in St Germains and 1.4% in Buninyong, so landlords in St Germains face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Buninyong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,797 against 75, roughly 51 times the size of St Germains; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: St Germains for rental income, St Germains for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison