Skip to main content

Burdell vs Newtown

Property investment comparison - Burdell, QLD 4818 vs Newtown, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burdell wins 4, Newtown wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurdellNewtown
Median house price$725K$730K
Median unit price-$590K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%3.97%
Gross rental yield (units)4.45%4.18%
1-year house growth+16.7%+18.4%
3-year house growth+65.9%+60.0%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.9%
Population7,17110,039

Burdell vs Newtown: what the numbers say

The median house price is $725K in Burdell and $730K in Newtown, so Burdell is the cheaper entry point, with Newtown houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Burdell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 3.97% in Newtown, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.7% in Burdell and +18.4% in Newtown, so recent momentum favours Newtown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Burdell houses are +65.9% and Newtown houses +60.0%, so Burdell has compounded faster than Newtown over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Newtown and 1.1% in Burdell, so landlords in Newtown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newtown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,039 against 7,171, larger than Burdell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burdell for rental income, Burdell for a lower purchase price, Newtown for recent price momentum, Newtown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison