Skip to main content

Burdell vs Rockville

Property investment comparison - Burdell, QLD 4818 vs Rockville, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burdell wins 3, Rockville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurdellRockville
Median house price$725K$715K
Median unit price-$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.45%3.70%
1-year house growth+16.7%+19.9%
3-year house growth+65.9%+65.8%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.0%
Population7,1713,204

Burdell vs Rockville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $725K in Burdell and $715K in Rockville, so Rockville is the cheaper entry point, with Burdell houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Burdell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 4.00% in Rockville, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.7% in Burdell and +19.9% in Rockville, so recent momentum favours Rockville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Burdell houses are +65.9% and Rockville houses +65.8%, so Burdell has compounded faster than Rockville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.1%.

Burdell is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,171 against 3,204, roughly 2.2 times the size of Rockville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burdell for rental income, Rockville for a lower purchase price, Rockville for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison