Skip to main content

Burdell vs Scarness

Property investment comparison - Burdell, QLD 4818 vs Scarness, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burdell wins 3, Scarness wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurdellScarness
Median house price$725K$725K
Median unit price-$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.45%-
1-year house growth+16.7%+14.1%
3-year house growth+65.9%+40.5%
Vacancy rate1.1%2.0%
Population7,1713,646

Burdell vs Scarness: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $725K in Burdell and $725K in Scarness.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.7% in Burdell and +14.1% in Scarness, so recent momentum favours Burdell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Burdell houses are +65.9% and Scarness houses +40.5%, so Burdell has compounded faster than Scarness over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Burdell and 2.0% in Scarness, so landlords in Burdell face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burdell is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,171 against 3,646, larger than Scarness; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burdell for recent price momentum, Burdell for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison