Skip to main content

Burleigh Heads vs Red Hill

Property investment comparison - Burleigh Heads, QLD 4220 vs Red Hill, QLD 4059

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burleigh Heads wins 1, Red Hill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurleigh HeadsRed Hill
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$1.3M-
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.39%
Gross rental yield (units)3.64%-
1-year house growth+12.0%estimate+10.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.0%1.3%
Population10,5725,834

Burleigh Heads vs Red Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Burleigh Heads and $1.9M in Red Hill, so Red Hill is the cheaper entry point, with Burleigh Heads houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Burleigh Heads (an estimate) and +10.2% in Red Hill (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Burleigh Heads, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Red Hill and 2.0% in Burleigh Heads, so landlords in Red Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burleigh Heads is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,572 against 5,834, larger than Red Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Red Hill for a lower purchase price, Burleigh Heads for recent price momentum, Red Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison