Skip to main content

Burleigh Heads vs Valdora

Property investment comparison - Burleigh Heads, QLD 4220 vs Valdora, QLD 4561

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burleigh Heads wins 3, Valdora wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurleigh HeadsValdora
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$1.3M$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.30%
Gross rental yield (units)3.64%3.37%
1-year house growth+12.0%estimate+3.7%
3-year house growth-+37.5%
Vacancy rate2.0%4.2%
Population10,572776

Burleigh Heads vs Valdora: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Burleigh Heads and $1.9M in Valdora, so Valdora is the cheaper entry point, with Burleigh Heads houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Burleigh Heads sits at a median of $1.3M against $1.0M in Valdora, which makes Valdora the more affordable unit market and Burleigh Heads the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Burleigh Heads (an estimate) and +3.7% in Valdora, so recent momentum favours Burleigh Heads, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Burleigh Heads and 4.2% in Valdora, so landlords in Burleigh Heads face less competition for tenants.

Burleigh Heads is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,572 against 776, roughly 14 times the size of Valdora; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Valdora for a lower purchase price, Burleigh Heads for recent price momentum, Burleigh Heads for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison