Burnett Creek vs Haigslea
Property investment comparison - Burnett Creek, QLD 4310 vs Haigslea, QLD 4306
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burnett Creek wins 3, Haigslea wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Burnett Creek | Haigslea |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | $730K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.94% | 1.65% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.56% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +54.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 4.2% |
| Population | 16 | 507 |
Burnett Creek vs Haigslea: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Burnett Creek and $1.4M in Haigslea, so Burnett Creek is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Burnett Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 1.94%, compared with 1.65% in Haigslea, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Burnett Creek and 4.2% in Haigslea, so landlords in Burnett Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Haigslea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 507 against 16, roughly 32 times the size of Burnett Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Burnett Creek for rental income, Burnett Creek for a lower purchase price, Burnett Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison