Skip to main content

Burnett Creek vs Lake Macdonald

Property investment comparison - Burnett Creek, QLD 4310 vs Lake Macdonald, QLD 4563

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burnett Creek wins 1, Lake Macdonald wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurnett CreekLake Macdonald
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price-$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.94%3.06%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.00%
1-year house growth-+10.1%
3-year house growth-+9.5%
Vacancy rate1.2%4.7%
Population161,352

Burnett Creek vs Lake Macdonald: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Burnett Creek and $1.4M in Lake Macdonald.

On cash flow, Lake Macdonald leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.06%, compared with 1.94% in Burnett Creek, a gap of 1.12 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Burnett Creek and 4.7% in Lake Macdonald, so landlords in Burnett Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lake Macdonald is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,352 against 16, roughly 85 times the size of Burnett Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lake Macdonald for rental income, Burnett Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison