Burnside Heights vs Lyal
Property investment comparison - Burnside Heights, VIC 3023 vs Lyal, VIC 3444
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burnside Heights wins 1, Lyal wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Burnside Heights | Lyal |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $795K | $800K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | 4.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.56% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +7.2%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.3% | 1.0% |
| Population | 6,377 | - |
Burnside Heights vs Lyal: what the numbers say
The median house price is $795K in Burnside Heights and $800K in Lyal, so Burnside Heights is the cheaper entry point, with Lyal houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Lyal leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.35%, compared with 3.70% in Burnside Heights, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Lyal and 2.3% in Burnside Heights, so landlords in Lyal face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
In short: Lyal for rental income, Burnside Heights for a lower purchase price, Lyal for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Burnside Heights, VIC 3023
Open Burnside Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Burnside Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison