Skip to main content

Burnside Heights vs Warrong

Property investment comparison - Burnside Heights, VIC 3023 vs Warrong, VIC 3283

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burnside Heights wins 3, Warrong wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurnside HeightsWarrong
Median house price$795K$800K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%2.43%
Gross rental yield (units)6.56%-
1-year house growth+7.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.3%6.0%
Population6,37777

Burnside Heights vs Warrong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $795K in Burnside Heights and $800K in Warrong, so Burnside Heights is the cheaper entry point, with Warrong houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Burnside Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 2.43% in Warrong, a gap of 1.27 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Burnside Heights and 6.0% in Warrong, so landlords in Burnside Heights face less competition for tenants.

Burnside Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,377 against 77, roughly 83 times the size of Warrong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burnside Heights for rental income, Burnside Heights for a lower purchase price, Burnside Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison