Burnside vs Charlton
Property investment comparison - Burnside, QLD 4560 vs Charlton, QLD 4350
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burnside wins 2, Charlton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Burnside | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.09% | 2.91% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.01% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 0.4% |
| Population | 3,104 | 107 |
Burnside vs Charlton: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.0M in Burnside and $1.0M in Charlton, so Burnside is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Burnside leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.09%, compared with 2.91% in Charlton, a gap of 1.18 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Charlton and 2.9% in Burnside, so landlords in Charlton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Burnside is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,104 against 107, roughly 29 times the size of Charlton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Burnside for rental income, Burnside for a lower purchase price, Charlton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison