Skip to main content

Burradoo vs Hurstville Grove

Property investment comparison - Burradoo, NSW 2576 vs Hurstville Grove, NSW 2220

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burradoo wins 2, Hurstville Grove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurradooHurstville Grove
Median house price$2.3M$2.4M
Median unit price$1.6M-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.50%2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.08%
1-year house growth-5.9%estimate-4.1%
3-year house growth--1.9%
Vacancy rate3.0%1.4%
Population2,8792,606

Burradoo vs Hurstville Grove: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.3M in Burradoo and $2.4M in Hurstville Grove, so Burradoo is the cheaper entry point, with Hurstville Grove houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Burradoo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.50%, compared with 2.23% in Hurstville Grove, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -5.9% in Burradoo (an estimate) and -4.1% in Hurstville Grove, so recent momentum favours Hurstville Grove, while Burradoo went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Hurstville Grove and 3.0% in Burradoo, so landlords in Hurstville Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burradoo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,879 against 2,606, larger than Hurstville Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burradoo for rental income, Burradoo for a lower purchase price, Hurstville Grove for recent price momentum, Hurstville Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison