Skip to main content

Burraneer vs Rodd Point

Property investment comparison - Burraneer, NSW 2230 vs Rodd Point, NSW 2046

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burraneer wins 1, Rodd Point wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurraneerRodd Point
Median house price$3.6M$3.6M
Median unit price$2.5M$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.85%1.80%
Gross rental yield (units)1.53%3.82%
1-year house growth+3.7%estimate+10.7%
3-year house growth-+1.9%
Vacancy rate6.9%3.4%
Population3,7191,380

Burraneer vs Rodd Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.6M in Burraneer and $3.6M in Rodd Point, so Rodd Point is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Burraneer sits at a median of $2.5M against $1.2M in Rodd Point, which makes Rodd Point the more affordable unit market and Burraneer the pricier one.

On cash flow, Burraneer leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.85%, compared with 1.80% in Rodd Point, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.7% in Burraneer (an estimate) and +10.7% in Rodd Point, so recent momentum favours Rodd Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 3.4% in Rodd Point and 6.9% in Burraneer, so landlords in Rodd Point face less competition for tenants.

Burraneer is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,719 against 1,380, roughly 2.7 times the size of Rodd Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burraneer for rental income, Rodd Point for a lower purchase price, Rodd Point for recent price momentum, Rodd Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison