Skip to main content

Burrier vs Thirroul

Property investment comparison - Burrier, NSW 2540 vs Thirroul, NSW 2515

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burrier wins 1, Thirroul wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurrierThirroul
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$625K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.92%3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.46%-
1-year house growth-+4.5%
3-year house growth-+8.3%
Vacancy rate2.6%1.6%
Population706,348

Burrier vs Thirroul: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Burrier and $1.9M in Thirroul.

For units, Burrier sits at a median of $625K against $1.2M in Thirroul, which makes Burrier the more affordable unit market and Thirroul the pricier one.

On cash flow, Thirroul leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 1.92% in Burrier, a gap of 1.18 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Thirroul and 2.6% in Burrier, so landlords in Thirroul face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Thirroul is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,348 against 70, roughly 91 times the size of Burrier; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thirroul for rental income, Thirroul for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison