Skip to main content

Burrum Heads vs Oakhurst

Property investment comparison - Burrum Heads, QLD 4659 vs Oakhurst, QLD 4650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burrum Heads wins 2, Oakhurst wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurrum HeadsOakhurst
Median house price$875K$880K
Median unit price-$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.23%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.94%
1-year house growth+11.8%+13.4%
3-year house growth+23.6%+34.6%
Vacancy rate5.9%3.5%
Population2,5381,717

Burrum Heads vs Oakhurst: what the numbers say

The median house price is $875K in Burrum Heads and $880K in Oakhurst, so Burrum Heads is the cheaper entry point, with Oakhurst houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Burrum Heads leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 3.23% in Oakhurst, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.8% in Burrum Heads and +13.4% in Oakhurst, so recent momentum favours Oakhurst, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Burrum Heads houses are +23.6% and Oakhurst houses +34.6%, so Oakhurst has compounded faster than Burrum Heads over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 3.5% in Oakhurst and 5.9% in Burrum Heads, so landlords in Oakhurst face less competition for tenants.

Burrum Heads is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,538 against 1,717, larger than Oakhurst; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burrum Heads for rental income, Burrum Heads for a lower purchase price, Oakhurst for recent price momentum, Oakhurst for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison