Skip to main content

Burwood vs Castlereagh

Property investment comparison - Burwood, NSW 2134 vs Castlereagh, NSW 2749

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burwood wins 4, Castlereagh wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurwoodCastlereagh
Median house price$3.1M$3.1M
Median unit price$900K$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.69%1.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.74%4.17%
1-year house growth+1.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%2.5%
Population18,2241,248

Burwood vs Castlereagh: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.1M in Burwood and $3.1M in Castlereagh, so Burwood is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Burwood sits at a median of $900K against $715K in Castlereagh, which makes Castlereagh the more affordable unit market and Burwood the pricier one.

On cash flow, Burwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 1.69%, compared with 1.60% in Castlereagh, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Burwood and 2.5% in Castlereagh, so landlords in Burwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,224 against 1,248, roughly 15 times the size of Castlereagh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burwood for rental income, Burwood for a lower purchase price, Burwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison