Skip to main content

Bushland Beach vs Churchill

Property investment comparison - Bushland Beach, QLD 4818 vs Churchill, QLD 4305

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bushland Beach wins 1, Churchill wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBushland BeachChurchill
Median house price$780K$775K
Median unit price-$320K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.36%3.85%
Gross rental yield (units)4.79%-
1-year house growth+13.0%+20.6%estimate
3-year house growth+61.5%-
Vacancy rate3.6%1.0%
Population6,6411,842

Bushland Beach vs Churchill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $780K in Bushland Beach and $775K in Churchill, so Churchill is the cheaper entry point, with Bushland Beach houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Bushland Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.36%, compared with 3.85% in Churchill, a gap of 0.51 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.0% in Bushland Beach and +20.6% in Churchill (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Churchill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Churchill and 3.6% in Bushland Beach, so landlords in Churchill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bushland Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,641 against 1,842, roughly 3.6 times the size of Churchill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bushland Beach for rental income, Churchill for a lower purchase price, Churchill for recent price momentum, Churchill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison