Skip to main content

Buxton vs North Batemans Bay

Property investment comparison - Buxton, NSW 2571 vs North Batemans Bay, NSW 2536

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buxton wins 2, North Batemans Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuxtonNorth Batemans Bay
Median house price$950K$950K
Median unit price$675K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%3.28%
Gross rental yield (units)1.96%4.80%
1-year house growth+11.8%+1.7%estimate
3-year house growth+25.5%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.1%
Population2,071794

Buxton vs North Batemans Bay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $950K in Buxton and $950K in North Batemans Bay.

On cash flow, Buxton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 3.28% in North Batemans Bay, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.8% in Buxton and +1.7% in North Batemans Bay (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Buxton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in North Batemans Bay and 1.5% in Buxton, so landlords in North Batemans Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Buxton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,071 against 794, roughly 2.6 times the size of North Batemans Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Buxton for rental income, Buxton for recent price momentum, North Batemans Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison