Skip to main content

Buxton vs Chinchilla

Property investment comparison - Buxton, QLD 4660 vs Chinchilla, QLD 4413

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buxton wins 2, Chinchilla wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuxtonChinchilla
Median house price$510K$535K
Median unit price$235K$380K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.79%5.55%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+12.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%0.9%
Population5077,068

Buxton vs Chinchilla: what the numbers say

The median house price is $510K in Buxton and $535K in Chinchilla, so Buxton is the cheaper entry point, with Chinchilla houses about 5% dearer.

For units, Buxton sits at a median of $235K against $380K in Chinchilla, which makes Buxton the more affordable unit market and Chinchilla the pricier one.

On cash flow, Chinchilla leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.55%, compared with 3.79% in Buxton, a gap of 1.76 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Chinchilla and 1.4% in Buxton, so landlords in Chinchilla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Chinchilla is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,068 against 507, roughly 14 times the size of Buxton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Chinchilla for rental income, Buxton for a lower purchase price, Chinchilla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison