Skip to main content

Buxton vs Memerambi

Property investment comparison - Buxton, QLD 4660 vs Memerambi, QLD 4610

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buxton wins 0, Memerambi wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuxtonMemerambi
Median house price$510K$490K
Median unit price$235K$180K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.79%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)-9.28%
1-year house growth+12.0%estimate+14.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%1.0%
Population507338

Buxton vs Memerambi: what the numbers say

The median house price is $510K in Buxton and $490K in Memerambi, so Memerambi is the cheaper entry point, with Buxton houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Buxton sits at a median of $235K against $180K in Memerambi, which makes Memerambi the more affordable unit market and Buxton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Memerambi leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.80%, compared with 3.79% in Buxton, a gap of 1.01 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Buxton (an estimate) and +14.5% in Memerambi (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Memerambi, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Memerambi and 1.4% in Buxton, so landlords in Memerambi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Buxton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 507 against 338, larger than Memerambi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Memerambi for rental income, Memerambi for a lower purchase price, Memerambi for recent price momentum, Memerambi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison