Skip to main content

Cabramatta vs Merrylands

Property investment comparison - Cabramatta, NSW 2166 vs Merrylands, NSW 2160

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cabramatta wins 3, Merrylands wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCabramattaMerrylands
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$505K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.74%
Gross rental yield (units)4.99%5.95%
1-year house growth+2.1%+5.4%
3-year house growth+23.4%+9.6%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.7%
Population21,14232,472

Cabramatta vs Merrylands: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Cabramatta and $1.4M in Merrylands.

For units, Cabramatta sits at a median of $505K against $540K in Merrylands, which makes Cabramatta the more affordable unit market and Merrylands the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.1% in Cabramatta and +5.4% in Merrylands, so recent momentum favours Merrylands, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Cabramatta houses are +23.4% and Merrylands houses +9.6%, so Cabramatta has compounded faster than Merrylands over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Cabramatta and 1.7% in Merrylands, so landlords in Cabramatta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Merrylands is the bigger suburb, with a population of 32,472 against 21,142, larger than Cabramatta; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Merrylands for recent price momentum, Cabramatta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison