Skip to main content

Caddens vs Valentine

Property investment comparison - Caddens, NSW 2747 vs Valentine, NSW 2280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Caddens wins 3, Valentine wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCaddensValentine
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$635K$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.72%4.14%
1-year house growth+8.0%+12.5%estimate
3-year house growth+14.5%-
Vacancy rate0.9%4.3%
Population3,4875,773

Caddens vs Valentine: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Caddens and $1.4M in Valentine.

For units, Caddens sits at a median of $635K against $860K in Valentine, which makes Caddens the more affordable unit market and Valentine the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Caddens and +12.5% in Valentine (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Valentine, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Caddens and 4.3% in Valentine, so landlords in Caddens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Valentine is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,773 against 3,487, larger than Caddens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Valentine for recent price momentum, Caddens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison