Cairnlea vs Montrose
Property investment comparison - Cairnlea, VIC 3023 vs Montrose, VIC 3765
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cairnlea wins 1, Montrose wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cairnlea | Montrose |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $980K | $980K |
| Median unit price | $410K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.63% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.52% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.0% | +2.9% |
| 3-year house growth | +0.2% | +15.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.3% |
| Population | 10,038 | 6,900 |
Cairnlea vs Montrose: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Cairnlea and $980K in Montrose.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.0% in Cairnlea and +2.9% in Montrose, so recent momentum favours Cairnlea, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Cairnlea houses are +0.2% and Montrose houses +15.8%, so Montrose has compounded faster than Cairnlea over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Montrose and 1.3% in Cairnlea, so landlords in Montrose face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Cairnlea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,038 against 6,900, larger than Montrose; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cairnlea for recent price momentum, Montrose for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison