Skip to main content

Calamvale vs Hunchy

Property investment comparison - Calamvale, QLD 4116 vs Hunchy, QLD 4555

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calamvale wins 2, Hunchy wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCalamvaleHunchy
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$830K$475K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.06%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%7.99%
1-year house growth+10.0%+11.2%
3-year house growth+48.5%+26.7%
Vacancy rate1.2%4.0%
Population17,994592

Calamvale vs Hunchy: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Calamvale and $1.4M in Hunchy.

For units, Calamvale sits at a median of $830K against $475K in Hunchy, which makes Hunchy the more affordable unit market and Calamvale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.0% in Calamvale and +11.2% in Hunchy, so recent momentum favours Hunchy, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Calamvale houses are +48.5% and Hunchy houses +26.7%, so Calamvale has compounded faster than Hunchy over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Calamvale and 4.0% in Hunchy, so landlords in Calamvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Calamvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,994 against 592, roughly 30 times the size of Hunchy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hunchy for recent price momentum, Calamvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison