Skip to main content

Calamvale vs Limestone Ridges

Property investment comparison - Calamvale, QLD 4116 vs Limestone Ridges, QLD 4305

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calamvale wins 2, Limestone Ridges wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCalamvaleLimestone Ridges
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$830K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.06%2.26%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%-
1-year house growth+10.0%-
3-year house growth+48.5%-
Vacancy rate1.2%0.5%
Population17,994135

Calamvale vs Limestone Ridges: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Calamvale and $1.4M in Limestone Ridges, so Calamvale is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Calamvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.06%, compared with 2.26% in Limestone Ridges, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Limestone Ridges and 1.2% in Calamvale, so landlords in Limestone Ridges face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Calamvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,994 against 135, roughly 133 times the size of Limestone Ridges; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Calamvale for rental income, Calamvale for a lower purchase price, Limestone Ridges for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison