Skip to main content

Callala Bay vs Ropes Crossing

Property investment comparison - Callala Bay, NSW 2540 vs Ropes Crossing, NSW 2760

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Callala Bay wins 1, Ropes Crossing wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCallala BayRopes Crossing
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.01%3.71%
Gross rental yield (units)6.17%5.07%
1-year house growth+1.4%+7.3%
3-year house growth-+20.4%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.8%
Population2,2347,280

Callala Bay vs Ropes Crossing: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Callala Bay and $1.1M in Ropes Crossing.

On cash flow, Ropes Crossing leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.71%, compared with 3.01% in Callala Bay, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.4% in Callala Bay and +7.3% in Ropes Crossing, so recent momentum favours Ropes Crossing, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.

Ropes Crossing is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,280 against 2,234, roughly 3.3 times the size of Callala Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ropes Crossing for rental income, Ropes Crossing for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Callala Bay vs Ropes Crossing: Suburb Comparison 2026