Skip to main content

Callignee vs Heathmont

Property investment comparison - Callignee, VIC 3844 vs Heathmont, VIC 3135

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Callignee wins 2, Heathmont wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCalligneeHeathmont
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$530K$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.81%3.26%
Gross rental yield (units)3.82%3.92%
1-year house growth--0.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate8.2%1.0%
Population3919,933

Callignee vs Heathmont: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Callignee and $1.1M in Heathmont, so Callignee is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Callignee sits at a median of $530K against $770K in Heathmont, which makes Callignee the more affordable unit market and Heathmont the pricier one.

On cash flow, Heathmont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.26%, compared with 1.81% in Callignee, a gap of 1.45 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Heathmont and 8.2% in Callignee, so landlords in Heathmont face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Heathmont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,933 against 391, roughly 25 times the size of Callignee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Heathmont for rental income, Callignee for a lower purchase price, Heathmont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison