Skip to main content

Callignee vs Mount Dandenong

Property investment comparison - Callignee, VIC 3844 vs Mount Dandenong, VIC 3767

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Callignee wins 2, Mount Dandenong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCalligneeMount Dandenong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$530K$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.81%3.65%
Gross rental yield (units)3.82%-
1-year house growth--1.0%
3-year house growth-+25.6%
Vacancy rate8.2%3.7%
Population3911,271

Callignee vs Mount Dandenong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Callignee and $1.1M in Mount Dandenong, so Callignee is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Dandenong houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Callignee sits at a median of $530K against $1.0M in Mount Dandenong, which makes Callignee the more affordable unit market and Mount Dandenong the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mount Dandenong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 1.81% in Callignee, a gap of 1.84 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 3.7% in Mount Dandenong and 8.2% in Callignee, so landlords in Mount Dandenong face less competition for tenants.

Mount Dandenong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,271 against 391, roughly 3.3 times the size of Callignee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Dandenong for rental income, Callignee for a lower purchase price, Mount Dandenong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison