Calulu vs Inverloch
Property investment comparison - Calulu, VIC 3875 vs Inverloch, VIC 3996
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calulu wins 2, Inverloch wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Calulu | Inverloch |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $835K | $840K |
| Median unit price | - | $590K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.33% | 3.28% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +1.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -12.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 6.6% | 1.7% |
| Population | 186 | 6,526 |
Calulu vs Inverloch: what the numbers say
The median house price is $835K in Calulu and $840K in Inverloch, so Calulu is the cheaper entry point, with Inverloch houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Calulu leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.33%, compared with 3.28% in Inverloch, a gap of 0.05 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Inverloch and 6.6% in Calulu, so landlords in Inverloch face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Inverloch is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,526 against 186, roughly 35 times the size of Calulu; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Calulu for rental income, Calulu for a lower purchase price, Inverloch for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison