Camberwell vs Freshwater Creek
Property investment comparison - Camberwell, VIC 3124 vs Freshwater Creek, VIC 3217
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Camberwell wins 0, Freshwater Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Camberwell | Freshwater Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.5M | $2.5M |
| Median unit price | - | $820K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.26% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.37% |
| 1-year house growth | -3.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -0.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.0% |
| Population | 21,965 | 454 |
Camberwell vs Freshwater Creek: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.5M in Camberwell and $2.5M in Freshwater Creek, so Freshwater Creek is the cheaper entry point, with Camberwell houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Freshwater Creek and 2.6% in Camberwell, so landlords in Freshwater Creek face less competition for tenants.
Camberwell is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,965 against 454, roughly 48 times the size of Freshwater Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Freshwater Creek for a lower purchase price, Freshwater Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Freshwater Creek, VIC 3217
Open Freshwater Creek suburb profileRecent sales in Freshwater Creek
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison