Skip to main content

Cambridge Park vs Charlestown

Property investment comparison - Cambridge Park, NSW 2747 vs Charlestown, NSW 2290

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cambridge Park wins 1, Charlestown wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCambridge ParkCharlestown
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$820K$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%4.46%
1-year house growth+13.5%estimate+14.9%
3-year house growth-+24.0%
Vacancy rate2.4%1.9%
Population7,05413,601

Cambridge Park vs Charlestown: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Cambridge Park and $1.1M in Charlestown, so Cambridge Park is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Cambridge Park sits at a median of $820K against $730K in Charlestown, which makes Charlestown the more affordable unit market and Cambridge Park the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.5% in Cambridge Park (an estimate) and +14.9% in Charlestown, so recent momentum favours Charlestown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Charlestown and 2.4% in Cambridge Park, so landlords in Charlestown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Charlestown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,601 against 7,054, larger than Cambridge Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cambridge Park for a lower purchase price, Charlestown for recent price momentum, Charlestown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison