Skip to main content

Camden Park vs Louth Park

Property investment comparison - Camden Park, NSW 2570 vs Louth Park, NSW 2320

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Camden Park wins 0, Louth Park wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCamden ParkLouth Park
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$720K$525K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.12%
Gross rental yield (units)3.83%5.90%
1-year house growth+1.9%estimate+10.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate9.9%1.3%
Population2,233922

Camden Park vs Louth Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Camden Park and $1.6M in Louth Park.

For units, Camden Park sits at a median of $720K against $525K in Louth Park, which makes Louth Park the more affordable unit market and Camden Park the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.9% in Camden Park (an estimate) and +10.9% in Louth Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Louth Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Louth Park and 9.9% in Camden Park, so landlords in Louth Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Camden Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,233 against 922, roughly 2.4 times the size of Louth Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Louth Park for recent price momentum, Louth Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison