Skip to main content

Camira vs Clontarf

Property investment comparison - Camira, QLD 4300 vs Clontarf, QLD 4019

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Camira wins 2, Clontarf wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCamiraClontarf
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$715K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.72%-
1-year house growth+15.6%+17.0%
3-year house growth+42.2%+39.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.6%
Population7,4158,446

Camira vs Clontarf: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Camira and $1.0M in Clontarf, so Camira is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.6% in Camira and +17.0% in Clontarf, so recent momentum favours Clontarf, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Camira houses are +42.2% and Clontarf houses +39.9%, so Camira has compounded faster than Clontarf over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Clontarf and 0.8% in Camira, so landlords in Clontarf face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clontarf is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,446 against 7,415, larger than Camira; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Camira for a lower purchase price, Clontarf for recent price momentum, Clontarf for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison