Skip to main content

Campbells Creek vs Emu Flat

Property investment comparison - Campbells Creek, VIC 3451 vs Emu Flat, VIC 3522

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Campbells Creek wins 2, Emu Flat wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCampbells CreekEmu Flat
Median house price$680K$680K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%2.75%
Gross rental yield (units)4.27%-
1-year house growth-2.2%-
3-year house growth-5.9%-
Vacancy rate0.4%3.8%
Population2,071338

Campbells Creek vs Emu Flat: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $680K in Campbells Creek and $680K in Emu Flat.

On cash flow, Campbells Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 2.75% in Emu Flat, a gap of 1.25 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Campbells Creek and 3.8% in Emu Flat, so landlords in Campbells Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Campbells Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,071 against 338, roughly 6 times the size of Emu Flat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Campbells Creek for rental income, Campbells Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison