Skip to main content

Campbells Forest vs Kings Park

Property investment comparison - Campbells Forest, VIC 3556 vs Kings Park, VIC 3021

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Campbells Forest wins 1, Kings Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCampbells ForestKings Park
Median house price$670K$670K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.46%3.88%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.57%
1-year house growth+6.1%estimate+6.9%
3-year house growth-+11.8%
Vacancy rate7.0%1.0%
Population508,203

Campbells Forest vs Kings Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $670K in Campbells Forest and $670K in Kings Park.

On cash flow, Campbells Forest leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.46%, compared with 3.88% in Kings Park, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.1% in Campbells Forest (an estimate) and +6.9% in Kings Park, so recent momentum favours Kings Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Kings Park and 7.0% in Campbells Forest, so landlords in Kings Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kings Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,203 against 50, roughly 164 times the size of Campbells Forest; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Campbells Forest for rental income, Kings Park for recent price momentum, Kings Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Campbells Forest vs Kings Park: Suburb Comparison 2026