Skip to main content

Campsie vs Dalwood

Property investment comparison - Campsie, NSW 2194 vs Dalwood, NSW 2477

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Campsie wins 1, Dalwood wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCampsieDalwood
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$690K$640K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.12%2.18%
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%5.85%
1-year house growth+8.9%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.3%0.3%
Population26,132218

Campsie vs Dalwood: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Campsie and $2.1M in Dalwood, so Campsie is the cheaper entry point, with Dalwood houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Campsie sits at a median of $690K against $640K in Dalwood, which makes Dalwood the more affordable unit market and Campsie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Dalwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.18%, compared with 2.12% in Campsie, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Dalwood and 1.3% in Campsie, so landlords in Dalwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Campsie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,132 against 218, roughly 120 times the size of Dalwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dalwood for rental income, Campsie for a lower purchase price, Dalwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison