Cams Wharf vs Minore
Property investment comparison - Cams Wharf, NSW 2281 vs Minore, NSW 2830
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cams Wharf wins 1, Minore wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cams Wharf | Minore |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750K | $750K |
| Median unit price | $795K | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.77% | 3.53% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.63% | 5.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +12.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.8% | 1.7% |
| Population | 182 | 194 |
Cams Wharf vs Minore: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Cams Wharf and $750K in Minore.
For units, Cams Wharf sits at a median of $795K against $350K in Minore, which makes Minore the more affordable unit market and Cams Wharf the pricier one.
On cash flow, Cams Wharf leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.77%, compared with 3.53% in Minore, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Minore and 5.8% in Cams Wharf, so landlords in Minore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Minore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 194 against 182, larger than Cams Wharf; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cams Wharf for rental income, Minore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison