Skip to main content

Canadian vs Creswick

Property investment comparison - Canadian, VIC 3350 vs Creswick, VIC 3363

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Canadian wins 3, Creswick wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCanadianCreswick
Median house price$600K$600K
Median unit price$445K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.77%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%5.88%
1-year house growth+14.1%+7.0%
3-year house growth+13.3%+9.5%
Vacancy rate0.4%0.7%
Population4,0983,279

Canadian vs Creswick: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $600K in Canadian and $600K in Creswick.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Canadian and +7.0% in Creswick, so recent momentum favours Canadian, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Canadian houses are +13.3% and Creswick houses +9.5%, so Canadian has compounded faster than Creswick over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Canadian and 0.7% in Creswick, so landlords in Canadian face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Canadian is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,098 against 3,279, larger than Creswick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Canadian for recent price momentum, Canadian for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison