Skip to main content

Canley Heights vs Macquarie Links

Property investment comparison - Canley Heights, NSW 2166 vs Macquarie Links, NSW 2565

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Canley Heights wins 3, Macquarie Links wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCanley HeightsMacquarie Links
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$730K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.79%3.76%
Gross rental yield (units)4.83%3.54%
1-year house growth+8.2%estimate+1.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%1.7%
Population12,3201,455

Canley Heights vs Macquarie Links: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Canley Heights and $1.4M in Macquarie Links.

On cash flow, Macquarie Links leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.76%, compared with 2.79% in Canley Heights, a gap of 0.97 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Canley Heights (an estimate) and +1.2% in Macquarie Links (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Canley Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Canley Heights and 1.7% in Macquarie Links, so landlords in Canley Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Canley Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,320 against 1,455, roughly 8 times the size of Macquarie Links; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Macquarie Links for rental income, Canley Heights for recent price momentum, Canley Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison